Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > Weather-Cocked > Current Kit Talk
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-20-2020, 12:29 PM
the mole's Avatar
the mole the mole is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 792
Default X-15

This is coming and I will definitely have to have a couple.

https://www.apogeerockets.com/Model...ocket-Kits/X-15

https://www.apogeerockets.com/Advan...ketry_Video_316

I always thought ESTES should have done one of these a long time ago. I wonder why they didn't?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-20-2020, 12:39 PM
heada heada is offline
Mildly Insane
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 83
Default

Didn't Estes have one but recalled it because it was only marginally stable at best and in the end actually was involved in a fatal accident? I seem to remember one about 10 years ago.
__________________
Aaron Head
NAR 83209 L2
TRA 11803 L2
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-20-2020, 12:43 PM
A Fish Named Wallyum A Fish Named Wallyum is offline
BP Mafia
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ft. Thomas, KY
Posts: 8,620
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by heada
Didn't Estes have one but recalled it because it was only marginally stable at best and in the end actually was involved in a fatal accident? I seem to remember one about 10 years ago.

They did do a plastic one that was involved in an accident at a Scouting launch, but not a fatal. That was a school demo launch. I thought it was a home built rocket, but it's been a while.
__________________
Bill Eichelberger
NAR 79563

http://wallyum.blogspot.com/

I miss being SAM 0058

Build floor: Centuri Mini Dactyl Estes - Low Boom SST Semroc - Marauder, Shrike, SST Shuttle

In paint: Canaroc Starfighter Scorpion Estes F-22 Air Superiority Fighter, Multi-Roc, Solar Sailer II Semroc Cyber III

Ready to fly: Estes - Solar Sailer II Semroc - Earmark, Groonie Der V 1/2
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-20-2020, 12:46 PM
heada heada is offline
Mildly Insane
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 83
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A Fish Named Wallyum
They did do a plastic one that was involved in an accident at a Scouting launch, but not a fatal. That was a school demo launch. I thought it was a home built rocket, but it's been a while.

You're right. I must have been mixing the two. It's been awhile and many drinks ago.

https://www.dallasnews.com/news/201...nded-by-rocket/

Estes did recall it and the recall was actually before the accident too.
__________________
Aaron Head
NAR 83209 L2
TRA 11803 L2
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-20-2020, 12:47 PM
the mole's Avatar
the mole the mole is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 792
Default

ESTES did make a small plastic X-15 years ago and they issued the old Cox X-15 which was recalled. What I meant was why didn't they make a nice buildable scale model of the X-15. This has always been a popular subject.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-20-2020, 01:55 PM
ghrocketman's Avatar
ghrocketman ghrocketman is offline
President, MAYHEM AGITATORS, Inc.
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Nunya Bizznuss, Michigan
Posts: 13,499
Default

The Estes re-issued Cox one was the one that was recalled.

Estes original small "firing line" one never had any issues. That one lasted til the early 80's in catalogs, but only as a RTF starter set.
__________________
When in doubt, WHACK the GAS and DITCH the brake !!!

Yes, there is such a thing as NORMAL
, if you have to ask what is "NORMAL" , you probably aren't !

Failure may not be an OPTION, but it is ALWAYS a POSSIBILITY.
ALL systems are GO for MAYHEM, CHAOS, and HAVOC !

Last edited by ghrocketman : 10-21-2020 at 10:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-20-2020, 02:36 PM
Flash's Avatar
Flash Flash is offline
Semi-Pro Rocketeer TRA 10484 L2
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 428
Default

Hey, Mole, saw that baby a few hours ago to include the first build video myself. May be one of the best models of the X15 ever built besides the One that a person named Paul Clark offered many moons ago under SPACECRAFT > BRITISH MODELS. That one was 1/20th Scale.

Here is a link to the Delta Wing version one he offered:

https://forums.rocketshoppe.com/sho...ight=delta+wing
__________________
=======================
If the Sky is the Limit, then,
why is there Footsteps on the Moon?
=======================
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-20-2020, 03:01 PM
the mole's Avatar
the mole the mole is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 792
Default

I have one each of the Clark kits. I have had them for years. Over the years I drag them out and tell myself I'm going to try to build them. Then a day or two I put the parts and instruction back into the box and put them away.

I have the SNG X-15 kits and think seriously about building the BT-80 size one but there's something funny about this kit to me.

I have always had good luck with Apogee rockets.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-20-2020, 03:05 PM
olDave olDave is offline
Craftsman
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 174
Default grammar nazi (way off subject)

Quote:
Originally Posted by the mole


Go ahead and tell me I'm nuts, but spelling and grammar problems (like those all over this apogee page) drive me nuts. Always makes me stop and wonder how smart the writer is, and if the products are any good. I know, I'm overdoing it. But it is SO SIMPLE to get right. Or did they flunk 4th grade grammar?

The kit looks cool. I might even get one. The stability problems with configurations like this are significant, so anyone building should heed the warnings about overbuilding the rear end.



"aircrafts"

REALLY?
__________________
NAR 20602
used to be "powderburner" in another life
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-28-2020, 04:29 PM
burkefj's Avatar
burkefj burkefj is offline
Craftsman
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 463
Default

Well, that and the fact that the builder put the wing star/bar on backwards and that is shown that way in the instructions too, and the stars and bars on the rear fuse should be on both sides, but of course that's a nit like spelling and grammar This is the first non R/C X-15 kit I've seen that actually looked correct in terms of wing and tail placement and size, wedge tail and the chine and canopy/nose shapes and has the cranked down rear stabilizers. On my R/C version I/m pretty close on shapes, but did not do the wedge stab or cranked stabilizers for weight and simplicity reasons. I've sent the decal pointer to SNG for the decals I had stickershock make which are much closer in terms of font and size than any other I've seen but he has decided not to use them..Apogee is pretty close on the decals except for reversed star/bar and missing one on the rear starboard side. For folks that can't fly R/C a normal rocket kit in this size was long overdue and as expected the demand is quite high.

Frank

Quote:
Originally Posted by olDave
Go ahead and tell me I'm nuts, but spelling and grammar problems (like those all over this apogee page) drive me nuts. Always makes me stop and wonder how smart the writer is, and if the products are any good. I know, I'm overdoing it. But it is SO SIMPLE to get right. Or did they flunk 4th grade grammar?

The kit looks cool. I might even get one. The stability problems with configurations like this are significant, so anyone building should heed the warnings about overbuilding the rear end.



"aircrafts"

REALLY?
__________________
RC Rocket glider kits
www.dynasoarrocketry.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:03 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe © 1998-2024