#1161
|
||||
|
||||
Usually those Maxi Brute X-Wings go for $250 or less.
Over $400 for a kit that was over produced and NOT RARE is also pure LUNACY. Somebody is WIGGING-OUT with a FAT WALLET.
__________________
When in doubt, WHACK the GAS and DITCH the brake !!! Yes, there is such a thing as NORMAL, if you have to ask what is "NORMAL" , you probably aren't ! Failure may not be an OPTION, but it is ALWAYS a POSSIBILITY. ALL systems are GO for MAYHEM, AGITATION, CHAOS, TURMOIL, FIASCOS, AGGRAVATION, INSTIGATION, NUISANCE-ACTION, and HAVOC ! |
#1162
|
||||
|
||||
This seller has, as they say, more than 10 of the Estes Vostok kit from the mid to latter 70s. Look to be in mint condition. These are not super-duper rare, but are one of the vintage kits that does not show up too very often. When they do, they tend to cost more than the $90 being asked for here. Still not a cheap price, but they do say $90 OR best offer, so maybe they will take an offer of $80 or so.
I don?t need anymore of these myself, but thought someone here might be interested. Not my listing nor do I know the seller. Link: https://www.ebay.com/itm/2046639875...ABk9SR9TPmN25Yw Earl
__________________
Earl L. Cagle, Jr. NAR# 29523 TRA# 962 SAM# 73 Owner/Producer Point 39 Productions Rocket-Brained Since 1970 |
#1163
|
|||
|
|||
hmmm.....I should probably sell the one sittng in my basement. I will probably never get around to building it...
|
#1164
|
||||
|
||||
Estes K-36
Hi all,
https://www.ebay.com/itm/226014923730 Never had one back in the day; did build the later updated kit back in the late '80s early '90s. Looks good but is there anything odd other than where the 2 main chutes recover from? Many thanks, Bob
__________________
illegitimi non carborundum NAR# 54643 L-1 SAM# 43 AMA# 157091 VRCS# 154 A&P# 42x xx xxxx. |
#1165
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
That one ejected at the top of the service module - fitting two 24" 'chutes (and a 12" for the Apollo capsule) - plus wadding - into that small tube was challenging. This is another one I'll be watching - I've got one of those - still in the shrink wrap - sitting around as well (granted, it has the Damon/Estes logo rather than the original logo - so a bit newer). |
#1166
|
||||
|
||||
Hi TD,
Many thanks! I'd recalled the 'chute set-up in previous post; just didn't word it correctly. Bob
__________________
illegitimi non carborundum NAR# 54643 L-1 SAM# 43 AMA# 157091 VRCS# 154 A&P# 42x xx xxxx. |
#1167
|
||||
|
||||
Basically the only difference between the K-36/1236 kit and the later #2001 kit was the ejection separation point. Nothing else other than the 2001 kit did not include the 3x18mm cluster interchangeable engine mount. 24mm only for the #2001 kit.
It flies MUCH better on a 3xC5-3 cluster than a single D12-3. It barely flies on a D12-3 and would never use less than a single E18 in 24mm.
__________________
When in doubt, WHACK the GAS and DITCH the brake !!! Yes, there is such a thing as NORMAL, if you have to ask what is "NORMAL" , you probably aren't ! Failure may not be an OPTION, but it is ALWAYS a POSSIBILITY. ALL systems are GO for MAYHEM, AGITATION, CHAOS, TURMOIL, FIASCOS, AGGRAVATION, INSTIGATION, NUISANCE-ACTION, and HAVOC ! |
#1168
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Larger Fins on the later 2001 kit, as the K-36 had slip on clear fins that friction fit over the scale size fins. |
#1169
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
and the Damon would have the newer non-checkerboard parachutes, this one has the original checkerboard parachutes. |
#1170
|
|||
|
|||
also the very early k-36, the box opened at the top end, not by lifing the whole "front" of the box, and the original Capsule had slightly less detail on it. No raised lines, as I recall.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|