Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > Work Bench > Projects
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-30-2022, 11:59 PM
Initiator001's Avatar
Initiator001 Initiator001 is offline
Too Many Initiators is Never Enough
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,313
Default Semroc Pro Cherokee

I bought one of these kits when they were released last year.

Now it is time to build it!

I already purchased the correct nosecone for the model.

I have two questions and would like some input from the members:

1) Round the leading/trailing edges of the fins or leave them square?

2) Which version to build? The original with the 16.35" BT-55 body tube or the later full 18" BT-55 body tube?

I reserve the right to ignore any and all answers.

Thanks.
__________________
Bob
S.A.M. # 0014
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-31-2022, 12:10 AM
ghrocketman's Avatar
ghrocketman ghrocketman is offline
President, MAYHEM AGITATORS, Inc.
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Nunya Bizznuss, Michigan
Posts: 12,688
Default

I only ever leave fin edges square if required for a scale build.
On almost every 3 or 4FNC rocket I round the leading edge and taper the trailing edge to a sharp knife like edge. It really makes a performance difference.
For futuristic rocket types such as a Scorpius, Trident, Star Speeder, or Manta Bomber, I just round all edges. Square fin edges on rockets make about as much sense as blunt stubby nose cones - ZERO.
__________________
When in doubt, WHACK the GAS and DITCH the brake !!!

Yes, there is such a thing as NORMAL
, if you have to ask what is "NORMAL" , you probably aren't !

Failure may not be an OPTION, but it is ALWAYS a POSSIBILITY.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-31-2022, 07:50 AM
astronwolf's Avatar
astronwolf astronwolf is offline
Lost his Drifter
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 987
Default

1) I'd at least round the leading edge.

2) I'd build the original shorty only because my original Cherokee was a shorty. IMHO the longer profile is a better flier though.
__________________
-Wolfram v. Kiparski
NAR 28643 - TRA 15520
I lost my Drifter
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-31-2022, 01:32 PM
BEC's Avatar
BEC BEC is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Auburn, Washington
Posts: 3,315
Default

Agree with both GH and Wolf - at least round the LEs (and I'd do tips, too).

I have a friend who was a test engineer at Grumman who found that square TEs, at least for the Reynolds numbers that small RC airplanes operate at, were just fine and even better than tapered ones with respect to drag. I haven't done the calculations to figure out the Reynolds number of, say, an Alpha fin at 200 mph (a reasonable speed for 2/3 of the way through a C6 burn) actually is to see if this applies to rockets like it does to an RC airplane at 40 mph with a 7 inch wing chord. But I have used that bit of info as an excuse to leave trailing edges square on many of my rocket builds.

Note that this has nothing to do with the Cherokee design itself.
__________________
Bernard Cawley
NAR 89040 L1 - Life Member
SAM 0061
AMA 42160
KG7AIE
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-31-2022, 03:12 PM
Gus's Avatar
Gus Gus is offline
7/21/61
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North of Detroit
Posts: 2,109
Default

Bob,

I always round the edges on sport models, only because I feel negligent if I donít, LOL.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-31-2022, 05:44 PM
MarkB.'s Avatar
MarkB. MarkB. is offline
Surfrajettes Fan
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: El Paso
Posts: 1,078
Default

Well,

I just finished painting my Semroc Cherokee.

I rounded leading, trailing and tip edges. But I also feel like a slacker when they mention "for those of you scoring at home" during televised baseball games.

I didn't have an option; it came 16.35 "long.


Suggestions: 12" parachute, drill and add a 2" long piece of 1/2" hardwood dowel in the nose cone for both weight and strength

Extra OCD fun: figure out where the CP and CG decals really should be placed.
__________________
Identifying a problem without proposing a solution is really just whining.

NAR 79743
NARTrek Silver
SAM 062

Awaiting First Launch: Aero-Dart; Tomahawk 12; Tomahawk 9; Paiute; Tomahawk 7; Rescue Aerobees(2); Timm Arcas; Sonda II; Nike-Ram (2); Centuri Screaming Eagle; Very Large Alpha
Finishing: Zooch Saturn V; Alway/Nau BioArcas; Semroc Cherokee
Repair/Rescue: Estes Bandit
On the Bench: 2650, Javelin
Dream Stage: 1/39.37 R-7; 1/10 SA-2
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-31-2022, 06:10 PM
Royatl's Avatar
Royatl Royatl is offline
SPEV/Orion wrangler
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,648
Default

Iíd round all edges. Otherwise it just doesnít look right.

I like the looks of the shorter model, but my original Cherokee in 1970 flew away, mostly horizontally, on its first flight as it changed course about 70 ft up, prob due to near neutral stability.
__________________
Roy
nar12605
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-31-2022, 06:40 PM
barone's Avatar
barone barone is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bartlett, TN
Posts: 3,286
Send a message via Yahoo to barone
Default

Round leading, taper trailing. Check CG with the shorter BT. Mine, years ago, was slightly unstable.
__________________
Don
NAR 53455
"Carpe Diem"
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-31-2022, 06:58 PM
ghrocketman's Avatar
ghrocketman ghrocketman is offline
President, MAYHEM AGITATORS, Inc.
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Nunya Bizznuss, Michigan
Posts: 12,688
Default

My RC airplanes fly a LOT faster than 40mph.
The slowest one does about 80mph.
Most of mine are capable of flying over 120mph.
Ballistic (old school) Pattern aircraft, Pylon aircraft, and Jets.
__________________
When in doubt, WHACK the GAS and DITCH the brake !!!

Yes, there is such a thing as NORMAL
, if you have to ask what is "NORMAL" , you probably aren't !

Failure may not be an OPTION, but it is ALWAYS a POSSIBILITY.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-31-2022, 10:21 PM
BEC's Avatar
BEC BEC is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Auburn, Washington
Posts: 3,315
Default

Yeah, I know.

The sort of model I was referring to is a small (3 foot span) moderately-powered (under 100 W, a little over 1 lb. flying weight) electric model. The person I was referring to designed a number of airplanes, and kitted some of them, which were made almost entirely with 1/8 x 1/4 inch strip stock. Consequently, they have 1/8th inch thick, square trailing edges on both he wing and the tail surfaces. I was thinking in terms of cruise speed for such a model, not top speed or landing/stall speed.

Your old school pattern ships probably are landing at not much under 40 mph.
__________________
Bernard Cawley
NAR 89040 L1 - Life Member
SAM 0061
AMA 42160
KG7AIE
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:39 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe © 1998-2022