Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > Work Bench > Scale & Sport Scale Rocketry
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-23-2011, 05:27 AM
blackshire's Avatar
blackshire blackshire is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 6,507
Default Generation Orbit SLVs

Hello All,

A new company called Generation Orbit (see: www.generationorbit.com ) has been formed to serve the nanosatellite and microsatellite markets. Their satellite launch vehicles will be air-launched from retired military aircraft (F-4, F-15, and Su-27) and executive aircraft (Gulfstream II and III). Their GO1 SLV will have a payload capability of 1 kg - 10 kg, while their larger GO2 will be able to orbit a minimum of 20 kg - 30 kg. They do have "purty pictures" of the vehicles on their web site, and I am delighted at the bold, garish 1950s-style paint schemes on the launch aircraft and the SLVs. Also:

With the new EDF (Electric Ducted Fan) R/C model jets (including scale ones) that are now available, these Generation Orbit vehicles would make for interesting "cross-over" R/C *and* model rocket flying scale models. As long as the rockets were launched from the model airplanes within 30 degrees of vertical, they should comply with the NAR Safety Code.
__________________
Black Shire--Draft horse in human form, model rocketeer, occasional mystic, and writer, see:
http://www.lulu.com/content/paperba...an-form/8075185
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6122050
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6126511
All of my book proceeds go to the Northcote Heavy Horse Centre www.northcotehorses.com.
NAR #54895 SR

Last edited by blackshire : 12-23-2011 at 05:52 AM. Reason: This ol' hoss done forgot somethin'.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-23-2011, 07:11 AM
MarkB.'s Avatar
MarkB. MarkB. is offline
Surfrajettes Fan
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: El Paso
Posts: 1,113
Default

True,

But it would NOT comply with the AMA code for projectiles from model aircraft.

Dropping a rocket-powered R/C X-1 from an R/C B-29: OK

Launching rockets from a P-38: NOT OK

It would be cool though. . . .
__________________
NAR 79743
NARTrek Silver
I miss being SAM 062

Awaiting First Launch: Too numerous to count
Finishing: Zooch Saturn V; Alway/Nau BioArcas; Estes Expedition; TLP Standard
Repair/Rescue: Cherokee-D (2); Centuri Nike-Smoke; MX-774
On the Bench: 2650;
Dream Stage: 1/39.37 R-7
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-23-2011, 09:25 AM
tbzep's Avatar
tbzep tbzep is offline
Dazed and Confused
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 11,624
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackshire
(F-4, F-15, and Su-27)(Gulfstream II and III)

That's an eclectic collection! I wish those were real photos instead of computer graphics. I wonder if (and hope) the company will ever get off the ground.

Not only do I not understand why they'd need five different launch platforms, I can't see them doing so many launches that they'd need more than one plane. Maybe a second for backup, but that's it.

As it stands, they will need parts and maintenance upkeep for five different planes. You'd think they would have gone after several of the same make in order to keep maintenance costs down.
__________________
I love sanding.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-23-2011, 09:35 AM
foamy's Avatar
foamy foamy is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: The Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 1,115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tbzep
That's an eclectic collection! I wish those were real photos instead of computer graphics. I wonder if (and hope) the company will ever get off the ground.

Not only do I not understand why they'd need five different launch platforms, I can't see them doing so many launches that they'd need more than one plane. Maybe a second for backup, but that's it.

As it stands, they will need parts and maintenance upkeep for five different planes. You'd think they would have gone after several of the same make in order to keep maintenance costs down.

I agree. If I was being asked to be an investor in that company, why, I'd be skeptical at the very least. It doesn't seem logical or rational.
__________________
Retro-grouch
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-23-2011, 10:05 AM
blackshire's Avatar
blackshire blackshire is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 6,507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkB.
True,

But it would NOT comply with the AMA code for projectiles from model aircraft.

Dropping a rocket-powered R/C X-1 from an R/C B-29: OK

Launching rockets from a P-38: NOT OK

It would be cool though. . . .
No problem! I'm a NAR member, but not an AMA member...
__________________
Black Shire--Draft horse in human form, model rocketeer, occasional mystic, and writer, see:
http://www.lulu.com/content/paperba...an-form/8075185
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6122050
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6126511
All of my book proceeds go to the Northcote Heavy Horse Centre www.northcotehorses.com.
NAR #54895 SR
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-23-2011, 10:14 AM
blackshire's Avatar
blackshire blackshire is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 6,507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by foamy
I agree. If I was being asked to be an investor in that company, why, I'd be skeptical at the very least. It doesn't seem logical or rational.
There is a method to their madness: the smaller GO1 vehicle is sized to be launched from fighter aircraft, while the larger GO2 is to be launched from Gulfstream II and III executive jets. The illustrations just show the various aircraft that -can- be used to launch the rockets, and I'm sure they'll buy or lease one fighter and (later) one business jet to launch satellites. In the meantime, they could practice and make money by air-launching surplus military 2.75" (70 mm) Hydra 70 and 5" (127 mm) Zuni rockets (both Folding-Fin Aircraft Rockets [FFARs]) as suborbital sounding rockets carrying commercial and student payloads. (In the 1950s, a subsonic jet fighter fired one or two instrumented 2.75" Mk 4 "Mighty Mouse" FFARs to altitudes of 54 km, if memory serves.)
__________________
Black Shire--Draft horse in human form, model rocketeer, occasional mystic, and writer, see:
http://www.lulu.com/content/paperba...an-form/8075185
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6122050
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6126511
All of my book proceeds go to the Northcote Heavy Horse Centre www.northcotehorses.com.
NAR #54895 SR
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-23-2011, 11:37 PM
Gus's Avatar
Gus Gus is offline
7/21/61
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North of Detroit
Posts: 2,235
Default

I'm having great difficulty imagining the dinky solid fuel rocket shown in the pictures accelerating to 17,500 mph, even with a mach 2 or 3 launch speed. The website is remarkably short on specifics, or animations.

I'm also having difficulty with the concept financially. Cost-to-orbit drops dramatically with increased payload size. I can't imagine a 1 to 10 kg payload ever being worth launching by itself. Current costs to orbit run anywhere from $4000 to $10000 per pound. Even with a best case scenario I can't imagine one of these launches costing less than $200,000.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-24-2011, 04:22 AM
blackshire's Avatar
blackshire blackshire is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 6,507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gus
I'm having great difficulty imagining the dinky solid fuel rocket shown in the pictures accelerating to 17,500 mph, even with a mach 2 or 3 launch speed. The website is remarkably short on specifics, or animations.
Air-launched SLVs can be surprisingly small (the U.S. Navy's "NOTSNIK" [see: http://www.designation-systems.net/...p4/notsnik.html ] was only 14 feet, 4.5 inches long!). This SPG (Space Propulsion Group, Inc.) proposed two-stage, F-15 launched LOX/paraffin hybrid propellant SLV (see: http://www.spg-corp.com/nanolaunch-project.html ) has a 22" diameter first stage and a 10" diameter second stage, a gross mass of 3,008 kg, and a payload of 30 kg to a 400 km orbit. SPG prepared this design for NanoLaunch, which is now known as Generation Orbit. The SPG design is their larger GO2 vehicle. Also:

A full-size mockup of the GO1 air-launched SLV was displayed (mounted under a MiG-21) at the Oregon International Airshow in August (see: http://www.premierspacesystems.com/Events.html and http://www.premierspacesystems.com/Nanolaunch.html ). Here (see: http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blog...8d-1dc834390f7e ) are more views of the Generation Orbit vehicles, as well as other firms' proposed air-launched SLVs. One of them is designed to be launched off the *back* of an F-15! Also:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gus
I'm also having difficulty with the concept financially. Cost-to-orbit drops dramatically with increased payload size. I can't imagine a 1 to 10 kg payload ever being worth launching by itself. Current costs to orbit run anywhere from $4000 to $10000 per pound. Even with a best case scenario I can't imagine one of these launches costing less than $200,000.
These air-launched SLVs are intended to solve two problems that face nanosatellite and microsatellite operators--launch scheduling and choice of orbit parameters. To date, these tiny spacecraft have had to ride as "hitch-hiker" payloads along with larger satellites, on a space-available standby basis. Also, the nanosatellite and microsatellite owners have had to settle for whatever orbit altitudes, periods, and inclinations that they could get, and these "grab-bag" orbits are often not optimal for their satellites' purposes. These satellite operators would prefer to have their spacecraft injected into *their* desired orbits *when* they want--that is why Generation Orbit's motto is "Your orbit on time." As in most businesses, many if not most of these nanosatellite and microsatellite operators would be willing to pay more--within reason--for such a launch service that would bend to fit *their* satellites' needs instead of their having to settle for whatever launch dates and orbits they could "scrounge up" as secondary payload "hitch-hikers."
__________________
Black Shire--Draft horse in human form, model rocketeer, occasional mystic, and writer, see:
http://www.lulu.com/content/paperba...an-form/8075185
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6122050
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6126511
All of my book proceeds go to the Northcote Heavy Horse Centre www.northcotehorses.com.
NAR #54895 SR

Last edited by blackshire : 12-24-2011 at 05:07 AM. Reason: This ol' hoss done forgot somethin'.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-24-2011, 10:06 AM
Gus's Avatar
Gus Gus is offline
7/21/61
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North of Detroit
Posts: 2,235
Default

Thanks for the info. I understand the issue of wanting to go to any orbit, any time, but I'm still having a hard time understanding the finances of this. Any idea what the proposed cost of putting a 10 kg satellite in LEO will be?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-25-2011, 12:47 AM
blackshire's Avatar
blackshire blackshire is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 6,507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gus
Thanks for the info. I understand the issue of wanting to go to any orbit, any time, but I'm still having a hard time understanding the finances of this. Any idea what the proposed cost of putting a 10 kg satellite in LEO will be?
I haven't read through their entire web site yet, so I don't know if they have a price or a price estimate. I think they are also interested in providing this launch-on-demand service to the military, in which case the cost would (within reason) be less important. Their GO2 vehicle will use SPG's very simple (and cheap to manufacture) LOX/paraffin hybrid motors for both stages, so they are working hard to push down the costs since their main market is commercial satellite operators.
__________________
Black Shire--Draft horse in human form, model rocketeer, occasional mystic, and writer, see:
http://www.lulu.com/content/paperba...an-form/8075185
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6122050
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6126511
All of my book proceeds go to the Northcote Heavy Horse Centre www.northcotehorses.com.
NAR #54895 SR
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:59 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe © 1998-2024