View Single Post
  #5  
Old 10-29-2010, 02:37 PM
tbzep's Avatar
tbzep tbzep is offline
Dazed and Confused
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 11,626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CPMcGraw
Hi, Allen.

The numbers were horrible for all three C6 engines. A pair of C6-3's deploy at over 120 FPS in the uphill portion of the flight. It was over 50 FPS uphill for the C6-5s, and over 30 FPS downhill for the C6-7.

Even if we had a C6-6 engine, it would still deploy uphill at over 26 FPS.

Running Quest C6-5's didn't improve the numbers any. These were also deploying over 50 FPS uphill.


Add detail to the rocket such as hydrogen or atmospheric sampling scoops, deflector arrays, antennae dishes, bulbous fin tips/instrument pods, etc. and use thicker balsa fins to make the model more draggy. From there, add a bit of weight until it works out with the C6-5's. The actual detail bits can vary based on whether you want the model to look like a scientific research, civilian passenger, military, or other type vehicle.
__________________
I love sanding.
Reply With Quote