View Single Post
  #6  
Old 05-18-2011, 07:33 AM
Shreadvector's Avatar
Shreadvector Shreadvector is offline
Launching since 1970.
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,188
Default

Everything you say is correct, but I am confused by your mentioning of the minimum cost kits and schools and youth groups, especially those in low-income areas.

Are you linking the schools, etc to the A3-6T motor/ Do you see a need for the A3-6T with these groups? Do you see sales potential?

I ask, because those groups typically need the exact opposite: they must NOT use a motor that can fly too high because the small rockets will fly out of sight and recover outside the school yard. Students cannot leave school property to run across roads to try to recover insanely high flying rockets, nor can the disappear into the adjacent neighborhood hunting through backyards for their lost rockets.

Youth group and school program rockets are best launched and recovered within the school yard. Hence the bulk packs of 1/2A3-4T and Up Aerospace models. They really could use bulk packs of 1/4A3-3T motors and they were going to make those at one time (and even had a product number) but then they had to reduce the total number of products being marketed at that time and the porposed new bulk pack was dropped along with some other motors.

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackshire
Hello All,

The discussion on the recent thread about minimum-cost model rocket kits for schools and youth groups, especially those in low-income areas (see: http://www.oldrocketforum.com/showt...10&page=1&pp=10 ) raises another possibility, for a "new" motor.

To achieve impressive altitudes with 13 mm mini motors, the models could be minimum-diameter rockets not unlike the Aerospace Speciality Products 13 mm Streamer Duration and Parachute Duration kits (see: http://www.asp-rocketry.com/store/c...fm?Category=176 ), although equipped with standard sport streamers. Depending on the rockets' size and mass, even BT-20/#7 size models could perform well on 13 mm motors.

Such rockets (especially minimum-diameter ones) could get the maximum altitude out of the Estes A3-6T mini motor (see: http://www.ninfinger.org/rockets/ca...74/74est54.html ). Also, if Estes put the A3-6T back into production, it would greatly improve the performance capabilities of their new two-stage mini motor powered kits. As a bonus, this motor would again be available to competition flyers.
__________________
-Fred Shecter NAR 20117 (L2)
Southern California Rocket Association, NAR Section 430
Reply With Quote