Thread: DECAP's
View Single Post
  #10  
Old 07-21-2011, 11:20 AM
chanstevens's Avatar
chanstevens chanstevens is offline
Rocket buildin' machine
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cincinnati OH
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ghrocketman
The DECAP idea sounds great !
Every delay for every engine.

As a side note, one could do all sorts of "unique" things with say a B5-9 in a large rocket....buuuwwhhhaaaahaha !

NAR needs to relax their draconian competition rules regarding reloads, PERIOD.
There is no reason AT ALL why they could not re-seal the 3 pak with a special NAR only tamper-proof seal.


Draconian rules? Sheesh, get over yourself. The reload rule is pretty stupid, but so is complaining about it when all it takes is writing up a rules change proposal and shooting it off to the appropriate volunteer (Jim Filler at the moment). Once a year everyone gets to vote on the proposals, and whatever passes goes into effect. The NAR itself doesn't write any rules or make any decrees. It's about the most grass roots, democratic, power-to-the-people part of the NAR and I'd think that's a bandwagon right up your alley for jumping on.

Out of curiosity, how many contests have you flown where you were either incovenienced by this Draconian rule, or did not fly specifically because of this Draconian rule?
Reply With Quote