10-18-2008, 10:26 PM
|
|
Master Modeler
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 2,345
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chas Russell
I asked Carl yesterday about the use of Brighton instead of Ranger. He did indeed rename it as deference to Vern and the early Estes kit. SEMROC is a class act, however you want to measure a company. Friendship comes before profit.
On another note, at a DARS launch today I flew my Ranger clone that uses an original Estes BNC-60L. Pranged it when I had a "motivation HIGH, judgement LOW" moment and put wadding and tape over the three B6-4s and two of the three clogged on the centering ring. The laundry did not deploy. Nose cone was okay due to recent rains, but the payload section and upper main body were destroyed. An opportunity to rebuild and so a better finishing job!
Hey, all three motors lit! Bother....
Doug Sams did comment that the original cone was more pointed than some of the "duplicate" cones being offered today.
Chas
|
Ouch! I bet that prang must have hurt. I gather the balsa nose cone came out ok? I've
always loved to look at the catalog pics of the Astron Ranger back in the good old days;
I thought that was one of the most "powerful" rocket kit of the day .
__________________
Dave, NAR # 21853 SR.
|