MGR-3A Little John question?
Hello All,
I have a question about the MGR-3A Little John un-guided artillery rocket, *not* the delta-finned XM47 test version that Estes and other model rocket companies have depicted in scale kits, but the operational version that had small, long-chord rectangular fins. Has anyone ever built and flown scale models of the XM51 (MGR-3A) rectangular-finned version? The reason why I ask is because the full-scale rocket was spun on its launcher at 3.5 revolutions per second before firing, and I was wondering if any flying scale models of it also had to be spun at launch (or equipped with a *lot* of nose ballast if not spun) in order to fly stably. Below are links to photographs and information on the Little John: http://www.postwarv2.com/littleJohn/photos.html http://sill-www.army.mil/FAMAG/1960...PAGES_20_25.pdf http://www.redstone.army.mil/histor...LITTLEJOHN.html http://travel.webshots.com/photo/21...042020642IxzOzM I hope this material will be useful. |
I always wonderd why they called it the clockwork rocket.
|
Quote:
CG in front of the CP. It is not only a good idea, it's the law... Bill |
Quote:
|
Quote:
An inherently unstable rocket cannot be made to fly straight under power unless it is spun at a high enough rate to behave gyroscopically. You would probably have to shoot it out of a long rifled barrel in order to do that. Canting the fins will not spin it fast enough, plus you would need to have the launch rod going through the axis, i.e. a cluster of motors around a central launch lug. Then you will begin to have problems with centrifigal force causing combustion to burn through the side of the motor cases. Bill |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:59 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.