I am waiting on my space shuttle orbiter to dry so I decided to start on a another rocket. Two years ago I cloned the Omega and had some good flights. Recently I gave it to a friend knowing I was going to build an original. This kit is in good shape. The wood and tubes are excellent and decals look brand new. The first thing that I noticed is how heavy the PNC-60Ah nose cone is. This nose comes in two pieces and it is heavy. The one thing I like about the nose is the fact there is no seam to sand. I built the clone as per the plans and never had any problems with ignition or ejection, I heard this was a common problem with the Omega. I am building this vintage one per the plans and hope to have the same luck. Has anyone else had good experiences or bad when building as per the plans?

I built one many years ago, when the kit first came out. A brother built one as well, although he modified his by switching the fins, putting the larger booster fins on the upper stage, and vice versa. I was very skeptical of the 'pop-and-go' staging since with previous two-stagers I had witnessed more than one sustainer ignition failure for something as simple as not using a tape seal between the two engines, but both birds had many two-stage flights, every one completely successful. It was a great design and my first D-powered bird and, at the time, my all-time favorite Estes rocket.

Joe

That's one of my very favorite rockets. I built one as a kid. It's long gone now but not forgotten.

I'm hoping someday to find one on ebay that isn't too expensive.

Enjoy the build!

I never had any problems flying my Omegas. I still have the boosters for 3 of the clones I have built. I lost two to the wind gods and another to a D12 cato. This has gotten me itching to build another upper stage again to go with the boosters. Maybe I'll make it a 3 stage.........

Joe W

My original Omega also had the two piece nose cone just like yours and I do remember it being heavier too. I remember I built two Omega rockets and never had a problem with staging them. The stock kit always flew well for me. I flew my original on Estes motors and the second Omega that I built used C-60F FSI conversion kits in both stages. It was stable with an F100 with a couple of inches of overhang in the booster staged to an F7 in the sustainer.

Thrustline Aerospace was offering a clone kit of the Omega for $26.95 but I procrastinated and Thrustline closed before I had a chance to purchase one. I was hoping to get all the parts and decals in one place. Pretty cool that you're building an original kit!

Search the forum ..... Bob {Initiator001} had built an Omega clone in a red/black/silver scheme for boosting the Oracle camera. If I build another I do want to boost a camera with it since I never was able to afford a camera payload when I bought my first Omega as a kid.

.

__________________
Steve Naquin
TRA# 677 L2
NAR# 85518 L2
SAM# 0052

🚀 In Construction: Der Blue Maxx/Minie-Magg 5.5” & Vander-Burn MDRM Clone w/Stickershock23 Custom Decals
🚀 In Paint & Detail: USR Banshee
🚀 In Build Queue: Estes Doorknob w/Vander-Burn Rocketry Upgrade Kit [Sport Decor], Semroc Centurion-F, Semroc Egg Crate
🚀 In Repair: SLS Lil’ Hustler, SLS Aero-Dart 1969 Trim
🚀 Stay Tuned For Fall 2021 Launch Dates

The injection molded cone is not only heavier, but it's almost 1/4" shorter than the modern blow molded version.

I built my Omega Cineroc clone straight from the Omega plans and everything worked out just fine. If you ever do fly a heavy payload with it, be sure to use a long rod and fly on a calm day. It tips off easily, especially if you forget and put a poopy clay D12-0 in there and the nozzle erodes enough to give it vectored thrust.

I flew my OMEGA clone as a triple-stager at NARAM-49.
True to history, it is almost horizontal when the third stage kicks in.

Attached Thumbnails

     

This is the perfect application for something like a D30-0 or E40-0, a high thrust, cored booster. I'm keeping my fingers crossed Using the rail was a good call. The extra feet are surely helpful.

I flew my Uber Tuber once on a D12-0, D12-0, D12-7 combo, and the flight was more horizontal than vertical, or so it seemed. It's BT-55 based and thus a bit lighter than the Omega, maybe a bit more so without the Cineroc capsule.

But my take is that doing a D12-0, D12-0, D12-7 combo is very risky no matter what is done. Even with a light build, long rod and low wind, it's gonna be marginal.

Doug



.

No sweat; even the real birds are going horizontal in order to achieve the orbital path .

__________________
Dave, NAR # 21853 SR.