#1
|
||||
|
||||
Testors glue test
Hello All,
Today I tested the Testors Non-Toxic Cement for Plastic Models (the kind that comes in a blue tube) to see how well it might work for typical model rocketry applications. I tested it for balsa wood grain filling (on sheet balsa and a balsa nose cone), laminating paper onto sheet balsa, reinforcing the ends of a body tube, and bonding paper together. I also conducted one test (for comparison) using the regular (red-tube) Testors Cement for Plastic Models for laminating paper onto sheet balsa. The results were surprising. The non-toxic cement was clear and had a pleasant, lemon-like scent. Its viscosity was thinner than I had expected; it flowed like warmed maple syrup. For balsa wood grain filling, I used a strip of cardstock to "squeegee" the cement onto a half-inch wide by six-inch long strip of 1/16" thick sheet balsa (from an Estes "220 Swift" kit). It readily soaked into the wood, and after the 4-hour full drying period listed on the tube it had hardened to a clear coating that did not leave any raised lumps (dried drops of excess cement, which I had intentionally left on some places). The balsa strip was stiffer that it had been before the cement was applied, and flexing it did not crack the shiny, cement-soaked surface. I obtained similar results with the balsa nose cone (a short, pointed ogive BT-20 nose cone from a Custom Rockets "Twister" kit). The cement did not completely fill its balsa wood grain, but its surface was quite hard after the cement dried. Also: I had inserted the shoulder of the Twister's nose cone into its body tube, to hold it upright while the cement dried. When I checked it later, I found that a small amount of the excess cement had run down the nose cone and soaked into much of the upper 3/16" of the body tube, from the inside of the tube. I feared that the nose cone had inadvertently glued itself into the body tube, but the cement had not bonded the two parts together at all. However: The upper part of the body tube where the cement had soaked in and dried was hard and stiff, *but* the cement had -not- left lumps on the inside of the tube. Where the cement had soaked into the inside wall of the brown kraft paper body tube, it had darkened the tube. I squeezed more of the non-toxic cement ~3/4" inside the tube and also applied some to the upper ~1/2" of the outside of the tube, then "squeegeed" it smoothly and uniformly onto the inside and outside of the body tube. The cement did not soak into the outside of the tube because the outer glassine coating prevented this, but it dried into a very thin, clear layer. The cement-soaked area of the inside of the tube was darkened, and the cement did not leave any layer or lumps on the inside of the tube; the nose cone fit into the tube as well as it had before. In addition: I used another 1/2" X 6" X 1/16" strip of sheet balsa to test the non-toxic cement's laminating properties. After "squeegee-ing" a thin layer of cement onto half of one side of the balsa strip, I pressed it down onto a sheet of 20 pound (75 grams per square meter) Georgia-Pacific "Copy & Print" paper (ordinary computer printer paper). For comparison, I did the same with another balsa strip, using the red-tube Testors Cement for Plastic Models (holding my breath to avoid breathing its irritating vapors). Four and a half hours later, the paper that I had laminated onto sheet balsa using the non-toxic cement peeled right off--it had not bonded to the balsa at all! (In complete contrast, the red-tube Testors cement bonded the paper to the balsa so completely that when I tried to peel the paper off, its upper layer tore, leaving the rest of the paper irremovably stuck to the balsa. Incidentally, none of this cement had soaked through the paper, and neither did it wrinkle the paper or leave lumps in the paper, even though I had intentionally applied too much of the cement to the balsa in a "glob-by" layer.) As well: The non-toxic cement did not bond paper to itself at all (at least not the paper I used). I pressed two strips of the printer paper together with a thin layer of cement. Strangely, the cement seemed to *repel* the paper strips apart, not unlike the way the metal leaves of an electroscope are pushed apart when an electrical charge is present. I repeated this test using an abundant amount of cement, with the same results. My conclusion: I would not dream of using the non-toxic Testors cement for assembling a plastic model kit, let alone for gluing the balsa fins of a model rocket onto its body tube, but it *is* useful for some model rocketry applications nonetheless. It "finds its calling" as a 'soak-in' stiffening, surface hardening, and waterproofing agent (in the manner of thin, "wicking" cyanoacrylate glues) for sheet balsa, balsa nose cones, body tubes, and motor mount tubes. I hope this information will be helpful.
__________________
Black Shire--Draft horse in human form, model rocketeer, occasional mystic, and writer, see: http://www.lulu.com/content/paperba...an-form/8075185 http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6122050 http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6126511 All of my book proceeds go to the Northcote Heavy Horse Centre www.northcotehorses.com. NAR #54895 SR |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quite interesting results indeed!
So you could use this cement to do some "anti-zipper" application at the top of a body tube? How was the surface of the fins after it dried on them? Was it smooth and grain-free? Does it sand? Did you try spraying primer on the fins and body tube to see how they would look? I have a tube of the stuff and I agree it doesn't seem to work very well in boding plastic and anything else but I never thought to try it on balsa as a filler/stiffener.
__________________
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Dale Marshall, San Antonio Texas NAR #90990 Semroc SAM #083 BAR Since 2008 Enjoying model rocketry since 1977. The Spotted Dragon -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I've been planning on doing a similar test with Testor's wood cement in the brown tube. Typically used in stick and tissue airplane modelling. I've tried using it to adhere fins to tubes. Gluing right to the glassine coating will result in the fin eventually coming off of the tube easily. However if you sand the coating of the tube off then it will work fine. I haven't tried the other tests such as papering , nose cone sealing etc.....
|
#4
|
||||||
|
||||||
Quote:
Quote:
The Custom Rockets "Twister" balsa nose cone, whose grain is more open, showed the partial (most of the way) grain-filling more prominently, and its surface (which "drank in" a significant amount of the thin cement) is now quite hard, like the surface of an injection-molded styrene plastic nose cone. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Black Shire--Draft horse in human form, model rocketeer, occasional mystic, and writer, see: http://www.lulu.com/content/paperba...an-form/8075185 http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6122050 http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6126511 All of my book proceeds go to the Northcote Heavy Horse Centre www.northcotehorses.com. NAR #54895 SR Last edited by blackshire : 05-23-2013 at 07:26 PM. Reason: This ol' hoss done had to correct a typo. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
In his "Handbook of Model Rocketry," G. Harry Stine also recommended sanding the glassine coating off body tubes where the fins and launch lug(s) are glued on, and not only for the Testors wood cement and other companies' equivalent products. In addition, he wrote in that book that "Model airplane glues, such as Testors Formula B, Pactra C-77, Ambroid, and Du Pont Duco Cement, are used for gluing balsa to itself or to fiber or paper body tubes. They will also glue paper together. They will bond some plastics but are not considered optimum for use on plastics because they will often melt some kinds of plastic." Now: If they will weld together styrene and ABS plastic, such glues might (if used carefully with adult guidance) be useful in group-building situations where time is precious. There isn't always a "best" cement or paint for use in all situations; sometimes other factors--such as limited available time for building sessions--can make a product that is normally considered inferior for an application be the most desirable one. As well, I would be curious regarding how the Testors wood glue works for papering balsa fins and filling balsa wood grain (I have heard of this glue being mixed with balsa dust for use in filleting the wing/fuselage joints on model airplanes).
__________________
Black Shire--Draft horse in human form, model rocketeer, occasional mystic, and writer, see: http://www.lulu.com/content/paperba...an-form/8075185 http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6122050 http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6126511 All of my book proceeds go to the Northcote Heavy Horse Centre www.northcotehorses.com. NAR #54895 SR |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Wow. It appears there may be an actual FUNCTIONAL use for Testors "Blue Tube" glue for sealing/strengthening wood/cardboard.
I think due to long drying time and overall very high cost/volume of product, Sanding Sealer, Balsa Fillercoat, Epoxy, and CA are all better for this purpose. If the Green and Yellow Tube Testors Wood Cements were still available in the Large-size 1.5 oz tubes, those would also be better economically, and still are better in relation to drying time. Useful for something ? Yes. Best choice for anything ? NO !
__________________
When in doubt, WHACK the GAS and DITCH the brake !!! Yes, there is such a thing as NORMAL, if you have to ask what is "NORMAL" , you probably aren't ! Failure may not be an OPTION, but it is ALWAYS a POSSIBILITY. ALL systems are GO for MAYHEM, CHAOS, and HAVOC ! |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
While the "Blue Tube" Testors cement wouldn't bond strips of printer/copier paper together at all (it actually made the strips *repel* each other somewhat), it soaked into the paper completely and did not wrinkle it at all, as white glue does. I'm going to test an hypothesis that, if correct, would make this cement very useful for scale modeling work. I'll let the cement soak into two strips of the paper, let them dry, and then apply more cement (Stine's "double-glue joint" method) to see if they will then bond to each other. If it works, intricate paper details (raised panels, corrugations, etc.), that would be both strong and wrinkle-free, could be applied to scale models. It would even (assuming that this test works) be possible to mold accurately-sized-and-shaped paper corrugations that could be glued strongly to body tubes. In this case, the cement's four hour-long drying time would be an advantage, allowing plenty of time to move or re-shape paper parts.
__________________
Black Shire--Draft horse in human form, model rocketeer, occasional mystic, and writer, see: http://www.lulu.com/content/paperba...an-form/8075185 http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6122050 http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6126511 All of my book proceeds go to the Northcote Heavy Horse Centre www.northcotehorses.com. NAR #54895 SR Last edited by blackshire : 05-25-2013 at 05:18 AM. Reason: This ol' hoss done forgot somethin'. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The balsa filling is something I'd have never guessed, interesting, very interesting. Quote:
__________________
later, Forrest "Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality." -- Nikola Tesla, Modern Mechanics and Inventions, July, 1934 |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Black Shire--Draft horse in human form, model rocketeer, occasional mystic, and writer, see: http://www.lulu.com/content/paperba...an-form/8075185 http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6122050 http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6126511 All of my book proceeds go to the Northcote Heavy Horse Centre www.northcotehorses.com. NAR #54895 SR Last edited by blackshire : 05-26-2013 at 05:50 AM. Reason: This ol' hoss done forgot somethin'. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Edit - just wrote Testors on their website. Not expecting an answer 9 o'clock sharp tomorrow morning, though. Edit 2 - not sure that's the blue tube, blue smells citrusy to me. "In 1969, Testor pioneered sniff-proof glue by adding mustard oil to its formula. The additive, which was intended to protect youth from inhaling harmful fumes, made sniffing glue extremely unpleasant, if not impossible. Testor made its formula available to other glue manufacturers at no charge and supported legislation in several states, including New York and New Jersey, which intended to make such additives mandatory." http://www.answers.com/topic/the-testor-corporation Edit 3 - Google just found this, "tbzep 03-31-2010 02:41 PM Quote: Originally Posted by blackshire Also, Testors now has a non-toxic version of their tube-type cement that is packaged in light blue tubes; the owner of our local hobby shop told me that it does a lousy job of bonding plastic joints but works well for paper joints. Since Testors now has this "safe" alternative glue, it would make sense if they changed the "dangerous" glue back to the original formula. The "safe" non-toxic blue tube has been around for decades. It was just as terrible back then as it is now. I doubt the regular orange/red tube or liquid cements have been changed back to the old formula. There's just too much govt. regulation and too many lawyers. Tennax 7R is where it's at. " http://www.oldrocketforum.com/printthread.php?t=6842
__________________
later, Forrest "Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality." -- Nikola Tesla, Modern Mechanics and Inventions, July, 1934 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|