Ye Olde Rocket Forum

Go Back   Ye Olde Rocket Forum > Work Bench > Rocket Boosted Gliders
User Name
Password
Auctions Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Search Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41  
Old 06-13-2016, 09:56 PM
tbzep's Avatar
tbzep tbzep is offline
Dazed and Confused
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 11,624
Default

Gotta go with the classic Jet Age graphics, or maybe even a pre-jet age scheme, but we'd need to go with white instead of polished aluminum. The biggest guns were TWA and PanAm, and to a slightly lesser extent Eastern, American and United ...we can also include BOAC to tip a hat to our friends across the pond that nearly had a world beater with the de Havilland Comet.

One could also go with the Boeing 367-80 (prototype 707) paint scheme, but you will have to put a Tex Johnson image in the cockpit along with micro gear and make it barrel roll.



.
__________________
I love sanding.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 06-13-2016, 11:37 PM
Digitalastro's Avatar
Digitalastro Digitalastro is offline
Intermediate Rocketeer
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 75
Default It fits!

It looks so small in the glider body.

Now, the question is, should I set up the elevons at the same angle as the described in the instructions, or do I set them neutral with the wing. Or should I set them at the angle for boost and then centered for glide?


Quote:
Originally Posted by JumpJet
It's plenty big to install a micro radio in.


John Boren
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:  shuttle brick.jpg
Views: 95
Size:  221.8 KB  
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 06-14-2016, 07:21 AM
Brent Brent is offline
Level 3
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 292
Default

If I get this kit I will most likely use a custom nose cone for the booster. Something like on the actual shuttle tank . I just don't like the looks of the long nose cone.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 06-14-2016, 09:26 AM
JumpJet's Avatar
JumpJet JumpJet is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pueblo Colorado
Posts: 1,307
Default

Quote:
Or should I set them at the angle for boost and then centered for glide?


I've not flown the complete stack with out this angle on the Shuttle elevators. It may or may not boost straight it changed. I was vey lucky on my original prototype in that the angle I choose for the elevators matched the balance point of the shuttle perfectly for a great gliding model. I in fact didn't have to add any weight to the shuttle to get it to balance for gliding flight. I'd say if you boost with little to no up elevator on the shuttle you will need to more the CG back a little more from where it is shown on the plans in order to get the shuttle to glide using RC without having the elevators sticking up much as they are for a free flight version. I look forward to your final radio set up and flight reports.

I've not done this myself but instead of using the paper index stock to cover the top and bottom of the shuttle you might try using 1/32" balsa. It would most likely weight no more and give you a better finish. You could also more easily create and access hatch in the model for your radio.



John Boren
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 06-14-2016, 06:00 PM
jeffyjeep's Avatar
jeffyjeep jeffyjeep is offline
Old Submariner
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Home of Wayne & Garth
Posts: 7,765
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent
If I get this kit I will most likely use a custom nose cone for the booster. Something like on the actual shuttle tank . I just don't like the looks of the long nose cone.


Maybe an Estes PNC-80B, although still not scale, could be build up to look more scale than the Phoenix/V2 cone that I assume the kit comes with.
__________________
Never trust an atom. They make up everything.

4 out of 3 people struggle with math.

Chemically, alcohol IS a solution.

NAR# 94042
SAM# 0078
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 06-14-2016, 06:04 PM
jeffyjeep's Avatar
jeffyjeep jeffyjeep is offline
Old Submariner
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Home of Wayne & Garth
Posts: 7,765
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tbzep
Gotta go with the classic Jet Age graphics, or maybe even a pre-jet age scheme, but we'd need to go with white instead of polished aluminum. The biggest guns were TWA and PanAm, and to a slightly lesser extent Eastern, American and United ...we can also include BOAC to tip a hat to our friends across the pond that nearly had a world beater with the de Havilland Comet.

One could also go with the Boeing 367-80 (prototype 707) paint scheme, but you will have to put a Tex Johnson image in the cockpit along with micro gear and make it barrel roll.



.


If you paint it up like the Comet I think it's guaranteed to prang!
__________________
Never trust an atom. They make up everything.

4 out of 3 people struggle with math.

Chemically, alcohol IS a solution.

NAR# 94042
SAM# 0078
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 06-14-2016, 07:44 PM
Brent Brent is offline
Level 3
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 292
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffyjeep
Maybe an Estes PNC-80B, although still not scale, could be build up to look more scale than the Phoenix/V2 cone that I assume the kit comes with.


I guess that you could put a hat on it like some Launch Pad kits use.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 06-14-2016, 09:30 PM
ghrocketman's Avatar
ghrocketman ghrocketman is offline
President, MAYHEM AGITATORS, Inc.
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Nunya Bizznuss, Michigan
Posts: 13,486
Default

I think I'm going to try covering the top and bottom of the orbiter with 1/64 plywood instead of cardstock or 1/32 balsa. Much tougher than either material, yet almost as light. Finishing 1/64 ply takes much fewer filler coats of dope than balsa so the weight is probably total same. Using Monokote covering would be even lighter, but that stuff is awful for painting details on. Paint adhesion on Monokote sucks.
__________________
When in doubt, WHACK the GAS and DITCH the brake !!!

Yes, there is such a thing as NORMAL
, if you have to ask what is "NORMAL" , you probably aren't !

Failure may not be an OPTION, but it is ALWAYS a POSSIBILITY.
ALL systems are GO for MAYHEM, CHAOS, and HAVOC !
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 06-15-2016, 07:49 AM
neil_w's Avatar
neil_w neil_w is offline
Mr. Cut-by-hand
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ghrocketman
I think I'm going to try covering the top and bottom of the orbiter with 1/64 plywood instead of cardstock or 1/32 balsa.

How much bend can you get out of 1/64 plywood? I was exploring some at a Michael's and without warning the whole sheet cracked, and I had not bent it very far. Will you be using a bunch of strips or trying to conform a smaller number of wider strips?

Photos of the process would be most appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 06-15-2016, 08:02 AM
jeffyjeep's Avatar
jeffyjeep jeffyjeep is offline
Old Submariner
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Home of Wayne & Garth
Posts: 7,765
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by neil_w
How much bend can you get out of 1/64 plywood? I was exploring some at a Michael's and without warning the whole sheet cracked, and I had not bent it very far. Will you be using a bunch of strips or trying to conform a smaller number of wider strips?

Photos of the process would be most appreciated.


I've bent solid basswood using steam but I've never tried it with ply.
__________________
Never trust an atom. They make up everything.

4 out of 3 people struggle with math.

Chemically, alcohol IS a solution.

NAR# 94042
SAM# 0078
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:31 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe © 1998-2024