#121
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I wasn't looking for a different color smoke, just more of it.
__________________
Scott D. Hansen Ye Olde Rocket Shoppe - Your One Stop BAR Shoppe! Ye Olde Rocket Plans - OOP Rocket Plans From 38 Companies! Ye Olde Rocket Forum WOOSH NAR Section #558 |
#122
|
||||
|
||||
Carl,
I really appreciate the risks you're taking to produce motors. So here is my commitment to you. The day you start producing motors, I will fly only Semroc motors of any type you produce. Period. Put me on the list for ten 3-packs of each type, the first day they are offered for sale. The first box of motors that Sheryl sends out I want to be addressed to me. I don't care what they cost. And I will personally sponsor "Semroc Day" at my local club, so everybody has a chance to fly the new motors just as soon as they are available. (You hear that Buzz, your first day of Semrocs are on me!) On the day I receive my first Semroc motors, my old motors of the same type will go into my collectables pile. From that day on, I will fly Semroc. All I ask is that you make a success of this (and that I go on the early list for an "I Fly Semroc" t-shirt and launch box sticker). There are many of us who REALLY want you to succeed at this. So I personally will do whatever I can to see that happen. Steve |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Flew completely over my head, I had to ask Craig. Gus, that's the spirit! I at least want to buy and test the product before I make that kind of statement. But really, given Semroc's track record, it's safe to assume the motors will be top notch. There's only a few suggestions over there that I don't agree with , but for the most part, everything I'm seeing sounds good. I don't think B14's and similar are worth the risk. I thought the colored smoke would be a good way to make the motors stand out from the competition, but I'd rather see some reliable, safe, motors be produced above all. Keeping it simple in the beginning makes good sense. Just getting these in people hands and creating a buzz will be challenging enough, but with the loyal following Semroc has cultivated, I think we've(this is a team effort with some kick ass owners) got a good shot at this! |
#124
|
||||
|
||||
B14's and the like are EXACTLY what I want from a new motor manufacturer and am willing to pay for them....frankly I'd be glad to buy B6-4's from Semroc instead of that unresponsive to customers company that Estes has become.
__________________
When in doubt, WHACK the GAS and DITCH the brake !!! Yes, there is such a thing as NORMAL, if you have to ask what is "NORMAL" , you probably aren't ! Failure may not be an OPTION, but it is ALWAYS a POSSIBILITY. ALL systems are GO for MAYHEM, CHAOS, and HAVOC ! |
#125
|
||||
|
||||
Not to be a spoil sport or a stick in the mud, but I really wish the hobby would get away from the emphasis on "effects" motors (though if the effect is simply part of the improvement of the motor's characteristics, I can't complain). White lightning is nice, blue thunder -- could take it or leave it, smoky motors are ok if that's the only way to get a slower burning propellant (though I doubt it!). To me, sparky motors are cool once, after that, just go burn some fireworks.
I'd rather have varied and reliable thrust characteristics.
__________________
Roy nar12605 |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
GH, from what I've been reading, it sounds like the B14 adds an addtional risk to the manufacturing process. I'm more concerned with safety issues for Carl and Co., over my need for thrust options. If Carl thinks it can be made safely, then by all means...crank 'em out! I've never used a motor that size, so I suppose I don't know what I'm missing. Was the B8 be a suitable replacement?
|
#127
|
||||
|
||||
The B8 was OK, as was it's brother the C5, but I really couldn't tell much of a difference. Other people swear by them, however.
In 1972-73, Trip Barber tested a number of B14s and B6's on MIT's test stand (one of fairly modern design, though it recorded onto pen/paper instead of to a computer), and there wasn't much difference between the two types! The B14s did have twice the max thrust, but it must've been a very quick spike, as the average thrust remained around 6 newtons. Earlier English unit Estes B3's did measure closer to spec, having a max thrust almost two pounds more than the 14s, with an average thrust of 15 newtons. I think the difference may have been the increased grain diameter of the newer motors (0.5" vs 0.41") didn't allow as deep a core as the old B3s.
__________________
Roy nar12605 |
#128
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Thanks for the confidence in us. It goes a long ways.
__________________
Carl McLawhorn NAR#4717 L2 semroc.com |
#129
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
My goal is to eventually get back to the Estes smoke of the late 60's and early 70's, dense dark yellow with very low "cookoff" after delay burnthrough. And that super sulphurous smell that mixes with Johnson's Baby Powder and makes a unique smell that is so 60's. Now THAT is an effect!
__________________
Carl McLawhorn NAR#4717 L2 semroc.com |
#130
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Carl McLawhorn NAR#4717 L2 semroc.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|