View Single Post
  #7  
Old 03-27-2015, 11:43 AM
blackshire's Avatar
blackshire blackshire is offline
Master Modeler
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 6,507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AstronMike
I've always found it easier to just use two gliders with a single central, usually finless, carrier tube. This also allows you to add length as needed, so you end up using less nose weight if needed. That 1467 internal pod orbiter sucked even when it flew 'right', as it weighed around 8z, most of this being the pod needed ballast weights. All that, on even a C5-3 was pretty dismal by my standards.

I've tossed around the idea of making a rather large full stack, but the diameter of the ET gets pretty out of sorts considering the size of the orbiters I'm considering. IIRC, that UHS shuttle project back twenty years ago in Sprocketry did not need fins at all due to its size, which was 1/40 scale.

Of course, it would be lots easier to just do two orbiters of good size and place them on like a 3" or 4" tube setup, but that would be cheesy, as orbiters rightfully 'belong' on a stack.
The trim of my 1467 foam Shuttle was excellent, but its flights were rather low and too-brief. I never tried it on an 18 mm Aerotech D10 or D21 motor, but one or both of those motors would likely have turned in satisfying flights.
__________________
Black Shire--Draft horse in human form, model rocketeer, occasional mystic, and writer, see:
http://www.lulu.com/content/paperba...an-form/8075185
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6122050
http://www.lulu.com/product/cd/what...of-2%29/6126511
All of my book proceeds go to the Northcote Heavy Horse Centre www.northcotehorses.com.
NAR #54895 SR
Reply With Quote